Showing posts with label Kentmere 100. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kentmere 100. Show all posts

Pentaxonomy: The Pentax ZX-7

It was with mild interest as I mused back upon my photographic past to realize that prior to my "digital hiatus" beginning in 2001, the camera maker from which I had shot the most different models of film cameras was in fact... PENTAX!

Among my earlier film camera experiences was shooting staff K-1000 cameras as a photographer at my college yearbook in 1991.  Later, when I became the editor of this yearbook, and enabled with some funds to replace the "K-Grands," I selected the P-30T model for offering an affordable choice with auto-exposure.  Years later, when I was a Bus Operator, I snapped up an IQ-Zoom 80 QD to carry with me as a means to occasionally document (on slide film!) the buses, routes, and settings I had the privilege of driving.

When I got back into film shooting however, Pentax had been conspicuously absent my "wants list." In each of my earlier examples of using a Pentax, the camera model was selected more for a pragmatic aspect of cost benefit in a pricey camera market than it was selected for the shooting experience.  The K-1000 simply was there already, and I didn't recall liking it much.  The P-30T performed fine, but always felt a bit cheap.  The IQ-Zoom was actually rather likable, and produced some decent results in favorable conditions, but seemed easily thrown by any varied lighting situation. Simply put, despite my interest in photography and sentimental ways, I was at a loss to conjure up nostalgia for shooting a Pentax.

You would at least think that given my exposure (pun intended) to the brand throughout the 1990's, I would at least be pretty well versed in "Pentaxonomy" but even this fails to ring true. Despite being a Popular Photography subscriber for most of the 1990's, I paid little in the way of attention to the Pentax brand, though much of this is due to the maker rarely getting much in the way of prominent attention at the time.  While Canon, Nikon, and Minolta stole the show with their many new releases, Pentax's line-up generally sat humbly in the backdrop.  There were some occasional feature stories on some of their more innovative releases, but most of the buzz tended to focus on the industry's "Big Three."

Or at least that's how I remembered it.  But then as I was digging through some online copies of Popular Photography from 1999, I spotted an advertisement that suddenly spurred a memory for me:


Suddenly, I could remember being the twenty-something "Quirky Geeky Guy with a Camera Magazine" seeing this very ad back when it first was featured.  I was totally enchanted by the idea of the light up dial featured on the ZX-7 at the time, but had not long beforehand picked up a Canon EOS Elan II-e, so this Pentax and its novel arrangement showed up just a hair too late for me to consider at the time.

But... here I was remembering this in a new era where the film cameras that cost several hundred dollars a decade and change ago could now be had for barely more than lunch money.  I stole off to ebay, found a nice looking ZX-7 for under $20 and pulled the trigger with little hesitation.

The Pentax ZX-7 has a fairly basic look that is hardly intimidating to the amateur photographer.

Admittedly, I was making a buying choice based on little more than a novelty feature, but it wasn't a huge investment.  Looking through what I could discover in documentation seemed to support that this Pentax could provide a new and welcome shooting experience for a person like myself who had been largely used to a much more manual experience.  I certainly looked forward to giving it a try.



The Pentax arrived safely, and I wasted little time putting in a pair of CR2 batteries to fire it up and see what it could do.  I generally liked the light weight and comfortable feel of the ZX-7 in my hands, and was generally pleased to see an informative but somewhat dim viewfinder to accompany the camera.  I was also quite pleased to discover just how interchangeable Pentax lenses are.  Unlike Minolta and Canon AF SLR's, the Pentax AF products readily take their legacy manual focus lenses. And while many of my Nikons feature a similar backwards compatibility, it can be very model-specific, requiring a lot of double checking via online lens-compatibility charts.  

One great feature of the Pentax line is the readily availability to use manual focus Pentax lenses on any autofocus body.  This privilege works in reverse as well. 

The top view of the Pentax ZX-7 relies on a minimal amount of dials and buttons to control features.  The main dial is actually the collar around the shutter release, unlike many models with a separate dial on top or back.  This arrangement actually works pretty well.  

And Yes, the main control dial DOES light up in full color as shown in the magazine ad.  It does so when mounted to a Pentax AF lens locked into the program mode when the control dial is set to one of the scene modes on the top of the dial.  It even does a neat scroll through the colors on the dial when started up, which you can see below:

Point and Shoot Pity Party Part 1: The Olympus Infinity Zoom 200

This is Part 1 of a recurring series on basic point and shoot consumer cameras, the details of which can be found here.

Olympus is a camera maker known over the decades for engineering some of the most compact cameras of their types.  Among the most well known of these are the svelte OM series of SLR cameras, but also the PEN half-frame cameras, XA and 35 series rangefinder models, and the modern micro 4/3 mirrorless digital cameras.  Thus, the rather blocky Olympus "compact" camera below caught me by surprise when I spotted it for sale in the thrift shop display case.  It was certainly among the earlier of autofocus point and shoot cameras, but was it any good?  I was about to find out. 


Name: Olympus Infinity Zoom 200
Format: 35mm
Type: Autofocus Point and Shoot 
Year: 1989
Features: Multi-Flash, Spot Focus, Auto Portrait Mode, Date Back, concealed removable remote trigger, Limited filter use possible with optional proprietary attachment.
Lens: Olympus 38-90mm f/4.5-6.4, 7 elements in 7 groups.
Battery: 2 CR-123 Cells.
Manual: http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/cpg_support_manuals.asp?id=972


Cost: $5.00
Cost When New (and adjusted): $250.00 ($485.00)
Where I found it: Goodwill, Ellicott City, MD.
Why I got it: Perusing the offerings of various point and shoot cameras, I wasn't terribly wowed by any of the choices, but a generally good Olympus reputation gave this model the nod over the others in getting me a cheap camera that was new to me.

What film: Fresh Dated Kentmere 100. 


Top View - Two distinctly colored buttons scroll through the shooting options.  Note that the zoom buttons are reversed from most set-ups.  Sadly, this way, while atypical, makes more sense from the grammatical perspective of Zoom IN(ward) for close ups, and Zoom OUT(ward) for landscapes. 


The viewfinder of the Infinity Zoom 200 is excellent, and uses easy to understand indications instead of the typical ambiguous lights.  "AF" confirms autofocus, the lightning symbol with "S" suffix suggests switching to the mode of the same name to reduce red-eye for people shots, while the simple lightning symbol denotes flash readiness and usage.

What I liked: 
  • Simple and logical two button interface.
  • Availability of the Spot Focus Feature.
  • Well sized viewfinder uses inset colored letter/graphic indicators for flash and focus status rather than simple lights on the periphery.
  • Multi-Flash mode was a really unique setting.
What I didn't like: 
  • Battery Hog requires 2 123 cells like an SLR and unlike most point and shoots that will require only one.
  • Battery cover had a tendency to pop off regularly.  
  • Never could figure out how to restore power to the date back.  
  • Comparatively bulky for a manufacturer renowned for products with small form factor.  
Results:

One could readily achieve focus on non-centered objects and recompose on the Infinity Zoom.


Close shots rendered quite nice, and out-of-focus areas portrayed nicely. 


Sometimes, achieving focus on tough subjects was a sticky spot with the Olympus.  Delved into shadow, the shutter speeds were on the longish side as well with 100 speed film.


Shots taken on the wide end rendered quite sharply on the Olympus. 


Not sure what went on here to cause such blur in this brightly lit scene.


I expected very little from the night performance of this Olympus with its apparent 1 second maximum shutter speed, but actually was nicely surprised to get this result. 


The multi-flash mode does a long shutter speed with 4 strobe blasts of the flash.  It took me a bit to figure a decent test for this, but I figured something out of wobbling back and forth in front of the cookie jar to take this photo.  I actually kind of like this odd mode. 


Marginal light and a marginal result.  A bit of movement blur, but otherwise a passable shot on an overcast day. 


Again, the Infinity Zoom struggled in the limited light to pull off a sharp photo.  


Another tough result compromised by a longish shutter speed. 


Certainly far better than the last two was this shot.


One other attempt at a macro type photo doesn't quite succeed. 


Thoughts: In good lighting, the Olympus did pretty well, while also putting forth some decent images in low light when aided by a tripod.  The multi-flash feature is a neat one that I will certainly look to find a particularly creative use for in the future.  The slight bulkiness of this early AF model combined with a tendency to struggle handheld in low light situations preclude this model from being an easily toted model for slower speed films.  My guess is that it would perform better with 400 speed film or faster.  

Despite its shortcomings, there was still something very refreshingly usable about the Infinity Zoom 200. It carries with it just enough tacky chic to make it oddly appealing in an "I don't care what you think" kind of way.  If I happen to have a pair of free 123 batteries and want an extra carry along on a photo ramble, I can certainly see it coming along for the ride.

Oh by the way, I did try to use the embedded "remote" to try a selfie for this article, but its reportedly non-replaceable battery designed for a minimum life of 6 years, had given up the ghost.